Luckily for a number of students working on their writing assignments, there is a sophisticated student-oriented plagiarism-checking service, which not only checks citations and references in papers written in MLA/APA formats, but also detects cheating. is a service utilizing modernized algorithms, which allows its users to enjoy results that are, on average, of higher quality than a number of other similar websites. Let us take a closer look at the service, and see what it can offer to its customers.

Plagiarism-Checking Algorithm

Comparison base checks for plagiarism matches throughout the Internet, using the Bing search engine. Bing indexes all the new pages appearing on the Web with a certain delay, and some people might see it as a problem, considering that does not have its own base of works. The thing is that in case of Bing, if a new page with unique content appears on the Internet and you manage to copy this material within the “delay window,” it will not be recognized as plagiarism. To justify, we can say that the chance you find such a website and plagiarize from it is so small, that it is not worth any concern.

Comparison algorithms

On the other hand, what is absolutely great about the service is its checking algorithms. Regular plagiarism checkers detect plagiarism only when there is a direct match of several words; usually, all students need to do to trick the checker is to change the word order. However, the advanced algorithms discussed here are able to juxtapose whole sentences, and check whether they are alike or not. In other words, it does not just seek similar word sequences, but rather analyzes overall semantics, structure, usage of possible paraphrases, and so on. knows when you change the order of words in sentences, or when you use synonyms (up to four synonyms in one sentence will still be recognized as plagiarism), or even when you rewrite a whole paragraph without indicating the original source properly.

Words Order
Quotes and References
Recognition of the significant parts of a paper

All the quotations are recognized properly, even if they have no quotation marks and are formatted according to MLA/APA requirements. The same goes for references: any matches found within them are marked with a special color, and are not counted in the overall percentage of the detected plagiarism.

There were no false alarms during the test. Texts with properly-cited sources and original content were always recognized as unique, and those that were copy-pasted elsewhere and then modified were still recognized as plagiarism. does much more complex work than regular plagiarism checkers, and the result may sometimes make you think that it is not a program, but rather some kind of artificial intelligence.

Algorithm evaluation


Time of checking

Now, talking about the convenience of using, it is good. Checking an average paper takes about half a minute; sometimes, when there is a lot of text to scan, it may take up to three minutes—this may not be the best result, but such occasions are too rare to take them into consideration seriously. What we did not quite like when testing the plagiarism checker is that it does not have any progress bar showing how much there is left to scan—the program only informs you that the analysis is in progress, but there is no way you can estimate how long it is going to take. However, what really makes the service stand out is that you can run multiple checks simultaneously, so you do not have to wait until a paper’s check is finished to upload another one. This is definitely an advantage, since there are many plagiarism checkers that do not keep a history of checks, so once you start a new one, older results are erased. From this point of view, is extremely convenient.

Report convenience

The report on the paper contains the original text with all the problematic segments highlighted, so you can see exactly where plagiarism is. When you hover the cursor over the highlighted area, the report shows you the list of sources where similar text fragments have been found. It does not yet show which parts of the sources have been plagiarised, but the developers promise to enable this feature; when it is done, it will make working with even more comfortable.

Usability evaluation

Website’s Functionality

Text input methods

Users can insert the texts they want to proofread right into the special field on the service’s homepage, or they can upload them via a separate document. The program can read multiple formats such as .doc, .docx, .txt, .odt, .rtf, and even .pdf—so whatever file format you have used to write your paper, the program will deal with it.

Report download

The report is downloaded as a PDF, which is super-convenient when you need to return to the results of the scan later. Unfortunately, there is no way you can share the report immediately after the program finishes checking the paper—you need to download it first, and then manually send it to the receiver.

Working with the report

The report has all the problematic zones highlighted; quotations and references are marked with a color different from the one used to highlight plagiarism, so you will not get confused when working with the report. This function is optional, and you can turn it off any moment you like, since the matches found within properly-cited references and quotations do not count as plagiarism. All the sources in which the matches have been found are listed in the right side of the report; if you wish to unmark a certain source of plagiarism, simply clear the check mark in front of it.

Functionality evaluation

Prices, Guarantee, Safety

Price of the service is not a free service, which is logical, considering its supreme checking quality. Users need to pay for a package of pages—similar to purchasing a season ticket to a gym with a fixed number of visits. Packages include 20, 50, and 150 pages (one page equals 275 words), and the good news is that once you pay for them, they are always available to you; they do not “burn” by the end of the month, which is definitely better than a more common subscription model, and there is no time limit within which the purchased package expires.

What is great, however, is that there is a way to test the plagiarism checker before purchasing subscription; every new user gets a free bonus page upon completing registration – in other words, you can upload a page of your text and evaluate the quality of the service on your own.

Money back guarantee

If you have not used any pages within two weeks since the moment you purchased a package, you can ask for a refund—your money will be returned in full.

Usage safety

The service does not add the scanned papers to its base (as we have mentioned before, there is no such base at all), so if you check the same paper twice, it will show you the same result as the first check. This is great, because you can be sure that when your teacher checks your work, they will absolutely not see find any plagiarism.


Overall Evaluation

Despite its small drawbacks, it is a reliable service for thorough and meticulous plagiarism checking. So if you value the originality of your papers, we strongly recommend you to use

  • Advanced plagiarism checking algorithms, which sometimes resemble AI in terms of being capable of detecting plagiarism even when it is concealed by paraphrasing, changing sentence structure, using synonyms, and so on.
  • High quality of plagiarism reports provided after each check—they are interactive, informative, and easy to navigate.
  • The possibility to run multiple scans at once.
  • There is no progress bar, which would show users how much more checking there is left.
  • Basic functionality lacks some extra features such as sharing a report.

Visit Site

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *